Compare / Databricks vs Liquid AI
DATABRICKS
Seven UC Berkeley researchers built the tool they wished existed for handling massive datasets, then realized …
LIQUID AI
Almost every AI company is building a bigger version of the same transformer that powers ChatGPT. Liquid AI de…
AT A GLANCE
FUNDING HISTORY
Databricks
Liquid AI
BUSINESS MODEL
Databricks
Databricks runs on a consumption-based pricing model. Companies pay for the compute and storage they actually use on the Databricks platform, measured in "Databricks Units" (DBUs).
The more data you process, the more you pay. This is brilliant because it means revenue grows automatically as customers' data volumes grow — which in the age of AI, they always do.
The platform runs on top of the major cloud providers — AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Databricks doesn't own servers.
They're a software layer that makes those clouds dramatically more useful for data work. They take a margin on top of the underlying cloud compute costs, essentially acting as a "toll booth" between companies and their data.
They also pioneered the "lakehouse" architecture — a mashup of data warehouses (structured, fast querying) and data lakes (cheap, handles any data format). Before Databricks, companies had to maintain both.
The lakehouse collapses them into one system. This isn't just clever marketing — it genuinely saves enterprises millions in duplicate infrastructure.
Liquid AI
Liquid AI builds foundation models, the big general-purpose brains that power chatbots and other AI tools. The difference is efficiency.
Their models, called Liquid Foundation Models, are designed to do more with far less memory and computing power. Companies pay to use them, either through a cloud API or by running the models on their own machines.
That second option matters. A bank or a hospital often cannot send private data to someone else's server.
Liquid AI lets them keep the model in-house. The pitch to a customer is basically this.
You get strong AI without renting a mountain of expensive chips.
HOW THEY STARTED
Databricks
Databricks started as a research project at UC Berkeley's AMPLab around 2009. Matei Zaharia, a PhD student, was frustrated with how slow Hadoop MapReduce was for iterative machine learning workloads.
His answer was Apache Spark — an open-source engine that could process data up to 100x faster than MapReduce by keeping data in memory instead of writing to disk after every step.
Spark took off fast in the open-source community. By 2013, it was the most active open-source project in big data.
Zaharia and six Berkeley colleagues — Ali Ghodsi, Andy Konwinski, Arsalan Tavakoli-Shiraji, Ion Stoica, Patrick Wendell, and Reynold Xin — decided to build a company around it. They incorporated Databricks in 2013 with the idea that Spark was powerful but brutally hard to set up and manage.
The company would offer a managed cloud platform that made Spark accessible to data teams who weren't distributed systems engineers.
Their first product was essentially "Spark as a service" — a collaborative notebook environment where data scientists and engineers could write Spark jobs without managing clusters. The bet was that enterprises had massive data problems but not enough PhDs to solve them.
They were right.
Liquid AI
Liquid AI is a spinout from MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, better known as CSAIL. The core science came from Ramin Hasani, who spent his PhD studying the nervous system of a tiny worm called C.
elegans. That worm has just 302 neurons and still manages to move, hunt, and react to its world.
Hasani and his collaborators asked a simple question. What if you built an AI that worked more like those neurons and less like a giant static network?
The answer was the liquid neural network, a model whose internal wiring keeps adjusting even after training is done. The team incorporated the company in 2023.
Daniela Rus, who runs CSAIL and is one of the most respected robotics researchers alive, came on as a co-founder. So did Mathias Lechner and Alexander Amini, both longtime research partners of Hasani.
HOW THEY GREW
Databricks
Databricks grew by being genuinely useful before being profitable. They contributed massively to Apache Spark's open-source ecosystem, which meant thousands of companies were already using Spark when Databricks offered to manage it for them.
The open-source-to-enterprise pipeline is the most powerful go-to-market motion in software.
They also bet big on partnerships. The Microsoft partnership was transformational — Azure Databricks became a first-party service on Azure, meaning Microsoft's sales force was effectively selling Databricks to every enterprise customer.
That single deal probably added billions in annual recurring revenue.
Acquisitions were strategic and well-timed. MosaicML in 2023 for $1.3 billion gave them proprietary AI training capabilities right when every enterprise wanted to build custom AI models.
Tabular in 2024 brought the creators of Apache Iceberg, another critical open-source data format. They bought the talent and the technology simultaneously.
Liquid AI
The growth angle is size, or the lack of it. Most frontier models are so heavy they only run in data centers.
Liquid AI aims for models light enough to run on a phone, a car, or a factory robot. That opens doors the giants cannot easily reach.
The AMD partnership pushes the same idea. AMD makes chips, and it wants efficient models that show off its hardware.
So AMD led the Series A and became both an investor and a distribution partner. Liquid AI also releases open models to researchers, which builds a following before the sales team ever makes a call.
THE HARD PART
Databricks
The elephant in the room is Snowflake. Both companies want to be the single platform where enterprises do all their data work, and the overlap is growing fast.
Snowflake started in SQL analytics and is pushing into data engineering and ML. Databricks started in data engineering and ML and is pushing into SQL analytics.
The collision is inevitable and expensive — both are spending billions on sales and R&D.
There's also the cloud provider threat. AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud all have their own data analytics services and could theoretically squeeze Databricks by making their native tools better or cheaper.
Databricks runs ON these clouds, which means their biggest partners are also their biggest potential competitors. It's the classic platform risk problem.
So far, Databricks has stayed ahead by innovating faster than the cloud providers' internal teams, but it's a race that never ends.
Liquid AI
The honest problem is Goliath. OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and Meta have raised tens of billions of dollars between them.
Liquid AI has raised under $300 million. The transformer architecture those giants use is battle-tested and improving fast.
Liquid AI has to prove its different approach not only works but keeps working as models get bigger. Betting against the most successful design in AI history is bold.
It is also the kind of bet that ends in either a great acquisition or a quiet shutdown, with not much room in between.
THE PRODUCTS
Databricks
Unity Catalog — a universal governance layer that lets companies manage permissions, lineage, and access control across all their data and AI assets in one place. Delta Lake — an open-source storage layer that brings reliability to data lakes with ACID transactions, schema enforcement, and time travel (yes, you can query your data as it existed at any point in the past).
Databricks SQL — a serverless SQL analytics product that competes directly with Snowflake on their home turf. Mosaic AI — their machine learning and generative AI platform, supercharged after acquiring MosaicML in 2023 for $1.3 billion.
Databricks Notebooks — collaborative workspaces where data teams write code, visualize results, and build pipelines together in real time.
Liquid AI
The main products are the Liquid Foundation Models, a family that ships in several sizes so a customer can pick the smallest one that does the job. The second generation, LFM2, arrived in 2025, including LFM2-VL vision-language models built for phones, laptops, wearables and embedded chips.
The company has leaned hard into on-device AI rather than the cloud. The focus is always the same.
Match the quality of a much larger model while using a fraction of the memory and power.
WHO BACKED THEM
Databricks
Andreessen Horowitz led multiple early rounds and has been the longest-standing institutional backer. Microsoft made a massive strategic investment alongside the Azure Databricks partnership.
T. Rowe Price, Tiger Global, and Franklin Templeton participated in later growth rounds.
NEA was an early investor. The $10 billion Series J in 2024 valued the company at $62 billion and was led by Thrive Capital, with later rounds multiplying that several times over with participation from Andreessen Horowitz, DST Global, GIC, Insight Partners, and WCM Investment Management.
Liquid AI
It started with a $37.5 million two-stage seed in December 2023 at a $303 million valuation, from OSS Capital, PagsGroup, Automattic (the company behind WordPress), Samsung Next and others. Angels included GitHub co-founder Tom Preston-Werner, Shopify's Tobi Lütke and Red Hat co-founder Bob Young.
Then AMD Ventures led the $250 million Series A in December 2024, which is unusual because AMD is a chipmaker, not a typical venture fund. That backing gave Liquid AI both money and a hardware ally.
When a major chip company writes the lead check on an efficiency-focused model maker, it signals a bet that the future of AI is not just bigger, it is leaner.