Kratos Defense logo
Cybersecuritydefensedronesunmanned-systems

KRATOS DEFENSE

Netfigo Verdict
on Kratos Defense

The US military has a problem — fighter jets cost $400 million each and there are never enough of them. Kratos has a solution: build a $3 million drone that can fly wingman to an F-22, absorb missiles, jam radars, and be replaced without a pilot's funeral. The XQ-58 Valkyrie is the most interesting new aircraft program in American defense, and Kratos built it with its own R&D money before the Air Force came knocking. Revenue is approaching $1 billion. This is not a startup — it is a defense prime in the making.

Founded

1994

HQ

San Diego, USA

Total Raised

Publicly listed (NASDAQ: KTOS); equity-funded through public markets

Founder

Eric DeMarco (CEO and architect of modern Kratos)

Status

Public (NASDAQ: KTOS)

THE ORIGIN STORY

The company that became Kratos started in 1994 in San Diego as Wireless Facilities Inc., a telecom infrastructure services company. It was publicly listed and growing, but telecom infrastructure was a grind.

Eric DeMarco took over as CEO in 2003 and spent the next decade making a series of pivotal decisions that transformed the company into something entirely different.

DeMarco saw that the US defense budget was enormous, the established primes (Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman) were slow and expensive, and there was a massive gap in the market for a nimble, cost-competitive defense technology company that would actually put its own capital at risk developing new products. The company was renamed Kratos Defense & Security Solutions and progressively acquired and built defense technology businesses.

The defining moment came with the Unmanned Systems Division and the development of high-performance aerial targets — drones built to simulate enemy fighter jets so US military air defense systems could train against realistic threats. From there, the step to autonomous combat drones was logical.

By the 2010s, Kratos was betting its own money on the XQ-58 Valkyrie loyal wingman concept before the Air Force had formally committed funding.

WHAT THEY ACTUALLY DO

Kratos has four main revenue streams. Its unmanned systems division builds high-performance aerial targets (drones designed to simulate enemy fighters for US military training), combat drones including the XQ-58 Valkyrie, and related systems.

Its satellite communications ground systems division sells the hardware and software that connects Earth to orbit — used by government and commercial satellite operators. Its government solutions division handles C4ISR (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) systems, training ranges, and classified communication networks.

Finally, its microwave electronics division makes the high-power components inside radar and electronic warfare systems.

The key competitive advantage is pricing. Kratos deliberately builds products at a fraction of what legacy primes charge by using modern manufacturing and putting its own R&D capital on the line rather than running cost-plus government contracts.

THE PRODUCTS

The XQ-58A Valkyrie is the flagship: a 28-foot wingspan autonomous combat aircraft capable of Mach 0.9, over 3,000-mile range, and designed to carry weapons or act as an electronic warfare platform alongside F-22s and F-35s. The BQM-167A is a high-performance subsonic aerial target used by the US Air Force and Navy to train missile systems against realistic threats.

Kratos satellite ground systems are used by over 200 commercial and government satellite operators worldwide. The company's microwave electronics components are inside radar and directed energy weapons across every major US military platform.

HOW THEY GREW

The contrarian insight at the heart of Kratos was Eric DeMarco's decision to fund product development with company money rather than waiting for government cost-plus contracts. Legacy primes demand that the government fund all R&D through cost-plus arrangements — expensive, slow, and profitable for the prime but not innovative.

Kratos built the Valkyrie largely with its own funds, which meant it owned the intellectual property and could offer the Air Force a fixed-price production program. That approach — being willing to take the technology risk — opened doors that were closed to larger, more bureaucratic competitors.

The Ukraine war and the subsequent surge in demand for affordable, expendable drone systems validated the entire strategic thesis. Every NATO ally suddenly needed Kratos-style capability.

THE HARD PART

Scaling from a $500M revenue company to a $2B+ revenue company without losing the agility that is its competitive advantage. The US defense procurement system rewards patience and political connections, and Kratos has both — but scaling production of complex hardware is not the same as writing software.

The XQ-58 Valkyrie needs to move from demonstration program to mass production, which requires capital investment and manufacturing discipline at a level Kratos has not yet demonstrated at scale. The Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) competition — where the Air Force will select drones to fly alongside manned fighters in large numbers — is the defining test.

MONEY TRAIL

Secondary Equity Offering

2012 · Led by Public Markets

$100M raised

Secondary Equity Offering

2022 · Led by Public Markets

$200M raised

WHO BACKED THEM

Kratos has been publicly traded on NASDAQ as KTOS since its transformation from Wireless Facilities. The company has funded growth primarily through equity offerings and retained earnings, not traditional venture capital.

Institutional investors including defense-focused asset managers and growth-oriented funds have held significant positions. The company completed a $200 million secondary equity offering in 2022 to fund expansion of its unmanned systems production capacity.