Slack

Sierra

Slack

Slack uses a freemium model. The free tier gives you access to your most recent 90 days of messages and 10 app integrations.

That's enough to get hooked. Then Slack charges per user per month — $8.75/month for Pro, $15/month for Business+, and custom pricing for Enterprise Grid.

The beauty of the model is that one person signs up, invites their team, the team gets addicted, and suddenly the company is paying for 500 seats. It's a virus that charges rent.

Sierra

Companies pay Sierra to run their customer service with AI agents instead of hiring rooms full of humans. The agent talks to your customers over chat.

It answers questions. It processes returns.

It updates subscriptions. Here is the clever part.

Sierra charges based on outcomes, not seats. Brands pay when the AI actually resolves a problem, not just for having the software installed.

That pricing is unusual. Most software charges a flat monthly fee no matter what.

Sierra only gets paid when the bot does the job.

Slack

Stewart Butterfield had already done this exact thing once before. In 2002, he was building a massively multiplayer online game called Game Neverending.

The game flopped but one of its features — a photo-sharing tool — became Flickr, which Yahoo bought for $35 million in 2005.

So in 2009, Butterfield did it again. He started a company called Tiny Speck to build another game called Glitch — a quirky, non-violent MMO where players collaborated instead of fighting.

The game was beautiful, weird, and a complete commercial failure. It shut down in November 2012 after never finding a big enough audience.

But the internal communication tool the Glitch team had built for themselves was something special. They had created a searchable, organized messaging system because email was driving them insane.

Every conversation was in channels. Everything was searchable.

Files were shared inline. It was everything email should have been but wasn't.

Butterfield looked at this internal tool and thought: this is the actual product. In August 2013, Slack launched in preview.

Within 24 hours, 8,000 companies had signed up. Within two weeks, it was 15,000.

The growth was so fast that Butterfield said it felt like "trying to drink from a fire hose."

Sierra

Bret Taylor had already done the impossible twice. He co-created Google Maps.

He later became co-CEO of Salesforce, chaired Twitter's board during the messy Elon Musk takeover, and became chairman of OpenAI in late 2023. Clay Bavor spent 18 years at Google, most recently running its Labs group.

The two friends left their big jobs in 2023 to build something together. They picked customer service on purpose.

It is the least glamorous corner of software. Their logic was simple.

Companies hate their support costs. Customers hate waiting on hold.

AI that actually resolves problems could fix both sides at once. They launched Sierra in February 2024 with $110 million from Sequoia and Benchmark.

Slack

Slack grew almost entirely bottom-up. Nobody sold Slack to companies.

Employees adopted it on their own and then convinced their bosses to pay for it. One developer would start using the free version, invite their team, and within weeks the whole department was hooked.

IT departments would discover that half the company was already on Slack before anyone asked for approval.

The integrations strategy was genius. Slack made it dead simple for other software tools to plug into Slack.

Instead of checking Jira for bug reports, Salesforce for deals, and GitHub for code changes, everything pushed notifications into Slack. Slack became the operating system of work — the one app you kept open all day.

Word of mouth was the main growth driver. Slack didn't spend heavily on advertising early on.

They spent on making the product feel delightful. The loading messages were funny.

The emoji reactions were addictive. The search actually worked.

People genuinely liked using it, which is almost unheard of for enterprise software.

Sierra

Sierra went straight for big brands, not tiny startups. SoFi, Ramp, ADT, Sonos and Brex signed up early.

By 2026 it said more than 40% of the Fortune 50 were customers. The trick was trust.

Enterprises are terrified of an AI bot going rogue and insulting a customer. So Sierra built guardrails and let each company control exactly how the agent behaves.

Bret Taylor's contacts did the rest. When the chairman of OpenAI calls a Fortune 500 CEO, they pick up.

Sierra hit $100 million in annual recurring revenue in November 2025, seven quarters after launch, and $150 million by February 2026. In April 2026 it launched Ghostwriter, which builds and deploys a new agent from a plain-English description.

Slack

Microsoft Teams was the existential threat. When Microsoft bundled Teams for free with Office 365 in 2017, Slack knew it was in trouble.

Microsoft had 300 million Office users who could start using Teams without paying anything extra. Slack even took out a full-page newspaper ad welcoming Microsoft to the chat market — a bravado move that masked genuine fear.

By 2020, Teams had overtaken Slack in daily active users purely on distribution.

The pandemic was a double-edged sword. Remote work exploded demand for Slack, but it also exploded demand for Teams, Zoom, and every other collaboration tool.

Slack's growth accelerated but so did everyone else's. The window where Slack was the obvious default was closing.

Revenue growth started slowing. After years of 50%+ annual growth, Slack's growth rate dropped to the low 30s by 2020.

Wall Street punished the stock, which dropped from its IPO price. The writing was on the wall — Slack couldn't outrun Microsoft alone.

In December 2020, Salesforce announced it was acquiring Slack for $27.7 billion. Butterfield stayed on as CEO until 2023, then left.

Sierra

Everyone is building AI customer service agents right now. Decagon has raised at a multi-billion valuation.

Salesforce, ServiceNow and Intercom all shipped their own agents. Sierra is not the cheap option.

It sells premium AI to giant companies that move slowly. The bigger risk sits underneath the product.

Sierra does not make its own AI models. It rents them from providers like OpenAI and Anthropic.

If those model makers decide to compete directly, Sierra's edge gets thin fast, and its co-founder chairing one of them only makes that question louder. A $15.8 billion valuation on roughly $150 million in revenue leaves almost no room for a stumble.

Slack

Slack is the core messaging platform — channels for teams, direct messages, threads for focused discussion, and huddles for quick voice/video calls. Slack Connect lets you message people at other companies directly through Slack instead of email.

Slack Canvas is a built-in document editor for notes and wikis right inside channels. Workflow Builder lets non-technical users automate repetitive tasks without writing code.

The App Directory has 2,600+ integrations — connect Google Drive, Salesforce, Jira, GitHub, or basically any tool your company uses.

Sierra

The core product is the Sierra AI agent. It is a branded customer service bot that companies deploy on their website, app, and phone lines.

It handles the boring stuff. Order tracking.

Refunds. Password resets.

Account changes. Sierra also built its own tools to test and monitor these agents so they do not make things up.

In 2024 the company added a voice version that talks to customers on the phone. In April 2026 it added Ghostwriter, a tool that builds and deploys a new agent from a plain-English description.

The whole pitch is one AI agent that carries your brand's name and never sleeps.

Slack

Accel Partners, Andreessen Horowitz, Social Capital, GV (Google Ventures), SoftBank, Dragoneer Investment Group

Sierra

Sequoia Capital and Benchmark wrote the first checks at launch in February 2024, $110 million between them. Greenoaks Capital then led both the $175 million round in 2024 and the $350 million round in September 2025.

In May 2026 Tiger Global and Google's GV led a $950 million round at a $15.8 billion valuation, with Benchmark, Sequoia and Greenoaks back in. That takes total funding to about $1.6 billion.

That is partly the product and partly Bret Taylor. Investors bet on founders who have already built billion-dollar things.