P
South African-Americanbiotechoncologyhealthcare-tech

PATRICK SOON-SHIONG

Developing Abraxane, a reformulated cancer drug he sold to Celgene for $2.9 billion, and owning the Los Angeles Times.

Netfigo Verdict
on Patrick Soon-Shiong

He grew up in apartheid South Africa as the son of Chinese immigrants who ran a grocery store, trained as a transplant surgeon at UCLA, reformulated an existing cancer drug by swapping one chemical for another, and sold the company for $2.9 billion. Then he bought a newspaper. His cancer moonshots through ImmunityBio and NantHealth have consumed well over a billion dollars without convincing Wall Street — but he has not blinked once. Either the science will vindicate him, or this will go down as the most expensive conviction in the history of Los Angeles. The jury is still out. So is a lot of money.

Net Worth

$8 billion

Nationality

South African-American

Time Horizon

Long-Term

Risk Appetite

8 / 10

Net Worth Context

  • · Still a billionaire — just the quiet kind at the end of the table.

CAREER & BACKGROUND

Patrick Soon-Shiong was born in 1952 in Port Elizabeth, South Africa, the son of Chinese immigrants who ran a small grocery store. He was among the first Chinese-South Africans to graduate from the University of the Witwatersrand medical school — a meaningful achievement in apartheid-era South Africa where institutional access was tightly controlled.

He moved to the United States in the 1970s, trained as a transplant surgeon at UCLA, and completed a fellowship at the University of British Columbia.

The business pivot came with American BioScience, a pharmaceutical manufacturer he founded that grew into American Pharmaceutical Partners. He took it public and eventually sold it to Fresenius Kabi in 2008 for roughly $4.6 billion.

But the bigger story was Abraxane. Paclitaxel had been an effective cancer drug for years, but the solvent used to deliver it — called Cremophor — caused severe allergic reactions.

Soon-Shiong asked a simple question almost nobody else thought to ask: what if the solvent is the problem, not the drug? He replaced Cremophor with albumin, a protein the body already produces naturally.

The drug became more tolerable, more effective in some cancers, and FDA-approved in 2005. Celgene bought the company that owned Abraxane, Abraxis BioScience, for $2.9 billion in 2010.

Since then he built NantWorks — a group of companies attacking cancer immunotherapy, healthcare IT, and AI-driven clinical decision support. NantHealth and ImmunityBio (formerly NantKwest) are both publicly traded.

Neither has performed the way he forecast at launch. In 2018 he added media to his portfolio, buying the LA Times and San Diego Union-Tribune from Tribune Publishing for $500 million.

He is also a part-owner of the LA Lakers — a team he first served as team physician starting in 1989.

COMPANIES & ROLES

Abraxis BioScience: Built around Abraxane, the reformulated cancer drug that replaced a toxic solvent with albumin. Celgene bought it for $2.9 billion in 2010 — the defining exit of his career and proof that improving drug delivery, not just inventing new drugs, can create enormous value.

ImmunityBio (formerly NantKwest): A publicly traded biotech working on cancer immunotherapy using natural killer cells. Has consumed significant capital in clinical programs and faces persistent skepticism from investors who want commercial revenue, not just clinical milestones.

NantHealth: A healthcare IT company built to deliver real-time clinical decision support to hospitals. Went public in 2016 at $16 per share.

Has traded well below that price for most of its existence. The vision was sound.

The commercial adoption was slower than anyone projected.

Los Angeles Times and San Diego Union-Tribune: Purchased from Tribune Publishing in 2018 for $500 million. He pledged editorial independence and a technology-forward newsroom.

The LA Times has since undergone multiple rounds of layoffs. The financial challenge of sustaining journalism at scale remains unsolved.

NantWorks: The umbrella holding company for all his ventures. Think of it as a personal research empire with ambitions that span cancer treatment, AI infrastructure, and healthcare data.

INVESTING STYLE & PHILOSOPHY

Soon-Shiong is a builder and concentrator, not a portfolio diversifier. He does not manage a fund or place bets in others' companies — he founds them, takes them public, and bets his own capital on his convictions.

Every venture connects to the same core thesis: medicine fails patients because it lacks real-time data and because drugs are poorly delivered. Fix the infrastructure and the outcomes improve.

With Abraxane, the fix was changing a solvent. With ImmunityBio, it is training natural killer cells to find and destroy tumors.

With NantHealth, it is routing genomic data to clinical decision systems in real time. The method starts from biology: understand the problem at a molecular level, identify where the prevailing approach is wrong, and fix it.

The commercial risk is that his timelines have repeatedly been longer than public markets tolerate. He concentrates capital, accepts long runways, and does not change direction when the market disagrees.

THE PLAYBOOK

Risk Approach

He is comfortable with large-scale personal financial risk when he believes in the underlying science. ImmunityBio has consumed well over a billion dollars in clinical research.

NantHealth went public at $16 and never recovered. The LA Times acquisition made no straightforward financial sense in the era of declining print media.

He absorbed all of this without materially changing direction.

His risk tolerance flows from a deep conviction that his scientific understanding is correct and that the commercial clock just runs longer in medicine than in software. He has said repeatedly that healthcare operates on a decade-long timeline, not a quarterly one.

That framing may be correct. It has been expensive for anyone who invested alongside him at peak valuations expecting faster returns.

Money Habits

He lives in Bel-Air in a home estimated at around $14 million — modest by LA billionaire standards. He is not known for yachts, private islands, or the kind of visible wealth that tends to define his neighborhood.

His spending concentrates in his companies: ImmunityBio research budgets, NantHealth platform costs, LA Times operations. These are simultaneously his career and his ongoing financial commitments.

He was the Lakers team physician from 1989 before becoming a part-owner, and reportedly drove himself to the Forum in ordinary cars for years. That detail says something about how he sees himself — as a scientist who happens to have money, rather than a billionaire who happens to do science.

BIGGEST WIN

He generated more than $7 billion from pharmaceutical exits in a single decade. First, American Pharmaceutical Partners sold to Fresenius Kabi in 2008 for roughly $4.6 billion.

Then Celgene paid $2.9 billion in 2010 for Abraxis BioScience, the company built around Abraxane. The Abraxane win was particularly elegant because the underlying insight was simple: everyone had accepted the toxic solvent as the cost of treatment, and he stopped and asked if the solvent itself was the problem.

It was. Replacing it with albumin made the drug more tolerable and more effective in some cancer types.

FDA approval came in 2005. The exit came five years later.

That is what it looks like when a scientist understands something the market has not yet priced.

BIGGEST MISTAKE

NantHealth went public in 2016 with a $16 IPO price and a compelling pitch: real-time clinical decision support for hospitals, powered by genomic sequencing and AI. The vision was genuine.

The problem was that hospitals are among the slowest institutions in the world to adopt new IT systems. Sales cycles run three to five years.

Procurement involves multiple committees. Budgets are constrained by insurance reimbursement rates that nobody can control.

He had built the technology correctly but dramatically underestimated how long it would take healthcare institutions to change their behavior. NantHealth never recovered its IPO valuation.

The lesson: in healthcare IT, great technology is table stakes. Change management is the actual product.

FINANCIAL PHILOSOPHY

He says he does not optimize for money — he optimizes for problems worth solving. His guiding principles: invest only in what you understand at a molecular or systems level, accept that biology and healthcare run on long timelines, and do not be deterred by public market skepticism when you believe the science is right.

He also believes in civic responsibility as a form of investment. The LA Times purchase was not a financial calculation.

He described it as an obligation — local journalism matters enough to warrant losing money on it. Whether that conviction can be financially sustained is the open question of his post-Abraxane career.

FAMILY & PERSONAL LIFE

He is married to Michele Chan, an actress who has remained active in philanthropy and her own ventures. They have two children.

The family is visible in Los Angeles civic life — Michele appears frequently at high-profile events while Patrick maintains a lower personal profile despite owning the city's flagship newspaper. He has spoken often about his parents, who ran a grocery store under apartheid, as the foundational influence on his work ethic and his belief that education is the only reliable path out of limited circumstances.

EDUCATION

He earned his MBBCh from the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, notable in part because he was among the first Chinese-South Africans admitted under apartheid. He trained as a transplant surgeon at UCLA, then completed a fellowship at the University of British Columbia.

He has never pursued an MBA and has never seemed interested in one. His medical training gives him a level of hands-on scientific credibility that most pharmaceutical executives simply do not have.

BOOKS & RESOURCES

The Emperor of All Maladies by Siddhartha Mukherjee

It won the Pulitzer Prize in 2011 and remains the definitive popular account of why cancer is so hard to beat — and why the immune system might be the best weapon against it. Soon-Shiong's entire research program is an attempt to make real what Mukherjee describes as the frontier of cancer medicine

The Billion Dollar Molecule by Barry Werth

A rigorous account of what it actually costs to turn a scientific insight into an approved drug. The capital requirements, the regulatory hurdles, the clinical trial failures — all the mechanics that make biotech one of the most expensive businesses in the world. It explains why Soon-Shiong's comfort with long runways is not unusual in this industry. In biotech, patience is not optional

As an Amazon Associate, Netfigo earns from qualifying purchases. Book links above may be affiliate links.

QUOTES (5)

Everyone had accepted that the reactions were part of the treatment. Nobody stopped to ask whether the solvent itself was the problem. That question changed everything.

abraxanecancer-researchTED MED Talk, 2018

I never set out to become a billionaire. I set out to solve a problem. The financial outcome was a consequence of getting the science right.

entrepreneurshipphilosophyUSC Commencement Address, 2019

A free press is not a luxury. It is essential infrastructure — as important as roads and bridges. That is why I bought the Los Angeles Times.

civic-responsibilityjournalismLA Times acquisition press conference, 2018

We were not trying to make a new drug. We were trying to make an old drug tolerable. That turned out to be a bigger solution than anyone expected.

abraxanedrug-developmentForbes interview, 2011

If we can sequence a patient's tumor and their blood in real time and have a treatment decision by the next morning, we will save lives. That is the system we are building.

genomicsoncologyJ.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference, 2016

NETFIGO SCORE

Proprietary 5-dimension investor rating

NETFIGO ORIGINAL

Risk Appetite

8
Treasury bondsLeveraged crypto

Contrarian Index

8
Pure consensusExtreme contrarian

Track Record

5
One-hit wonderDecades of wins

Accessibility

3
Billionaires onlyCopy-paste strategy

Time Horizon

Day Trader
Swing
Medium-Term
Long-Term
Generational

Head-to-Head

Compare Patrick Soon-Shiong vs another investor.

Are you a Patrick type?