Zip logo
SaaSsaasprocuremententerprise-software

ZIP

Netfigo Verdict
on Zip

Zip is solving the procurement problem that every company over 100 employees has but rarely talks about: buying things inside a company is chaos. Employees route requests through Slack threads and email chains because the official procurement tools are too painful to use. Rujul Zaparde and Lu Cheng — both former Airbnb product managers — built Zip to fix that. Y Combinator backed them in 2021. Tiger Global joined the Series A in 2022. They hit significant revenue milestones faster than most enterprise software companies do in their first two years. The intake-layer strategy is smart: get embedded first, expand the footprint later.

Founded

2020

HQ

San Francisco, California

Total Raised

$149.5M

Founder

Rujul Zaparde & Lu Cheng

Status

Private

Website

ziphq.com

THE ORIGIN STORY

Rujul Zaparde and Lu Cheng met at Airbnb, where both worked as product managers. They watched Airbnb deal with the same problem that afflicts every fast-growing company: employees needed to buy things — software, services, hardware — but the official procurement process was so clunky that everyone worked around it.

Purchase requests went through email. Approvals happened over Slack.

Invoices got lost. Nobody had a clear picture of what the company was spending.

Zaparde and Cheng applied to Y Combinator with the idea in late 2020. They got in as part of the Winter 2021 batch.

Zip launched as a simple intake layer: submit a purchase request, the system routes it to the right approvers, everyone can track it in one place. They signed enterprise customers before they had a full team.

The product was so obviously needed that early sales almost closed themselves.

WHAT THEY ACTUALLY DO

Enterprise SaaS with annual contracts. Zip charges companies based on the number of users and the complexity of their procurement workflows.

Typical deals for growth-stage companies start around $50,000 annually. Large enterprise contracts run into several hundred thousand dollars per year.

The more systems Zip integrates with — SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, Coupa, Ironclad — the stickier the product becomes and the harder it is to replace without significant disruption.

THE PRODUCTS

Intake and Orchestration — the core purchase request form that routes requests to the right approvers with automated workflows. Contract Management — tracking vendor agreements from signature through renewal, with automated alerting on expiration dates.

Vendor Management — a central directory of approved vendors with compliance, risk, and spend data. Payment Tracking — connecting purchase orders to invoices to actual payment confirmation.

Analytics Dashboard — spend visibility by category, department, and vendor across the entire company.

HOW THEY GREW

Zip grew by going deep on integrations rather than building a standalone system. They connect to every major ERP, payment tool, and contract management platform rather than asking companies to replace existing systems.

That integration-first approach shortened sales cycles dramatically — companies could adopt Zip in weeks rather than the months required by traditional procurement software. Speed of deployment became a competitive advantage.

Zip also focused on the mid-market and high-growth company segment first, where procurement pain is acute but legacy software lock-in is less severe than at the Fortune 500 level.

THE HARD PART

Procurement software has entrenched giants. Coupa Software was acquired by Thoma Bravo at a $8B valuation.

SAP Ariba has the largest enterprise installations globally. As Zip moves upmarket into larger enterprise accounts, it runs directly into those players with massive sales teams, deep integration histories, and customers who have been on their platforms for a decade.

The intake-layer positioning is smart for initial adoption but creates a question about long-term defensibility: can Zip own enough of the workflow to justify the contract size it needs at scale?

MONEY TRAIL

Seed

2021 · Led by Y Combinator

$7M raised

Series A

2022 · Led by YC Continuity

$43M raised

Series B

2023 · Led by BOND Capital

$100M raised

WHO BACKED THEM

Y Combinator, Y Combinator Continuity, Tiger Global, CRV, BOND Capital